Girls with pucks!
Friday, November 13, 2009 at 8:23AM
There is a hot news story brewing in my backyard. A local girl's hockey team is threatening gender discrimination, when it comes to the amount of ice time they receive from local arenas. You can read the full story here, because I'm not about to get into the logistics of the claim. I do, however, have an opinion on the topic. I will tread very lightly on this one because I have good friends who are true blue hockey families, as well as sis-in-law who plays hockey regularly. She's not in my backyard, but I'm sure she would dive right into this story.
As you know, Y and Z both play hockey. Y plays in the local house league and Z is in the hockey school, which is run out of our local arena. They both play once a week. Y plays one game a week, no practice. There is no ice time for house league players to get a practice. As you can probably imagine, you can't get better at hockey if you're only playing once a week. We supplement Y's ice time by taking him to open skate at the arena when we can. We would love him to be able to play twice a week. It would be great for his skills, but also for building some team spirit. You barely get to know the other players on your team when you're only together once a week. There is currently a proposal in place to build a second ice pad on land adjacent to our arena. The money is in place and logistically it's ready to go. So what's the hold up? The City of Toronto is the hold up. The same City of Toronto who will now try to squeeze out current ice time holders so that there can be more time for the girls. You get where I'm going right? Let's cut through the red tape and get the ice pad built so that there is more ice to play on. This makes sense to me.
I also know for a fact that my gf's son's who play for the "local" team (at the AA level), rarely (if ever) plays on their home ice. The local arena is shared by figure skating groups as well as hockey teams. Also figure into the equation that at the nine year old level, there are AAA, AA, A as well as a Select teams. That's a lot of teams to find ice time for...and that's just nine year old boys! I think you could probably (and I maybe cutting my own throat here, I appologise) cut out Select teams for six and seven year olds. I'm sorry, but do you really, really need to put a six year old on the ice twice to three times a week...really? I understand the need to start kids early, but in a city where ice is at a premium, maybe we could re-think when kids begin playing competitive hockey? Don't get me wrong, I understand that starting kids early (at anything) is good, but is it necessary? The Daddy played competitive at a teeny tiny age, but he wasn't living in Toronto. And to be truthful with you, I hope my Z will play Select next year (B team...we're keeping our expectations low) but it won't kill us, or him, if he doesn't make the team. Maybe some of the men's teams need to step aside and make room for the ladies. I'm mean seriously big boys...if you want to play hockey for fun at 30+, then you can certainly afford to pay the premium for ice time at areas that would require you to drive a little further. It won't hurt you!
For our family, hockey is important. My son's aren't stars and there is certainly no NHL in their future, but we do want them to play and hopefully, eventually love it. As with many sports, hockey is expensive and exclusive. I think you need to accept that before your child gets involved. For many families it involves hours of driving, car-pooling and life that revolves around the sport. It is also a fact that historically, hockey is a boys sport, and it may take a long time for girls to gain equality...or at least equal ice time.
For the record, when I was looking for images to post and entered "girls hockey" in Google images and my stock photography web-site, most pics were of girls playing field hockey. What does that tell you?












